18+ Play responsibly. Betting involves risk. Ad disclosure

Accumulators: the arithmetic, the insurance offers and how to bet them if you must

The most popular bet in the world and the most profitable for the bookmaker. What an accumulator costs at each number of legs, when acca insurance is worth something, and the four rules that make one less expensive.

Key points

  • Each leg multiplies the margin: four legs at five percent cost nearly nineteen percent, six legs cost twenty-six.
  • Acca insurance and boosts are worth real money only when the legs are priced fairly to begin with.
  • Fewer legs, best price per leg, no correlated selections, no builders.

What it costs

LegsMargin per leg 3 percentMargin per leg 5 percentMargin per leg 8 percent
13.0 percent5.0 percent8.0 percent
25.99.815.4
38.714.322.1
411.518.528.4
616.726.539.4
821.633.748.7

The margin on an accumulator is 1 minus the product of (1 - margin) over the legs. An eight-fold of 1.30 favourites at a European brand, where the favourites carry 8 percent margins, hands the bookmaker nearly half the stake in expectation. It is the bet the industry advertises most, and the table is the reason.

Why people bet them anyway

A small stake for a large return is the product; the price of the product is in the table. There is nothing wrong with paying it as entertainment. There is a great deal wrong with paying it in the belief that it is a way to make money, or with paying more of it than necessary.

Acca insurance and boosts

Insurance refunds the stake, usually as a free bet, when one leg of a five-fold or more loses. Worth roughly the probability of exactly one leg losing times the free bet’s value; on a five-fold of 1.50 legs that is a few percent of the stake, which offsets part of the margin but not most of it. Boosts add a percentage to the winnings by number of legs, ten percent for five legs and so on; a ten percent boost on a five-fold with a 15 percent margin leaves a 6.5 percent margin, still worse than a single. Both are worth taking when the legs would have been bet anyway and are priced at the best available odds; neither turns the bet into a good one.

The best price per leg. A four-fold with legs at 1.80, 1.90, 2.10 and 1.75 pays 12.57 at one operator. The same legs at the best price each across our twenty-two operators, say 1.85, 1.95, 2.20 and 1.80, pay 14.28: 14 percent more, for no extra risk. Most operators allow accumulators only within their own book, so the alternative is four singles across four operators, which pays the same as the better accumulator on average and loses less often.

The four rules

  • Fewer legs. A treble is a bet; an eight-fold is a lottery ticket priced by the bookmaker.
  • Best price per leg. Shop each selection; the difference compounds like the margin does.
  • No correlated legs. A team to win and the same team over 1.5 goals: the bookmaker either refuses the combination or prices the correlation against you. Builders are that pricing sold as a feature.
  • No cashing out of winning positions. The haircut on an accumulator cash out is applied to the whole compounded price; a hedge at the exchange on the last leg costs a tenth as much.

The honest alternative

Singles, at the best price, sized by the bankroll rules. Less exciting on a Saturday; considerably richer by May.

Frequently asked questions

How much worse is an accumulator than singles?

The margins compound: four legs at 5 percent cost 18.5 percent against 5 percent for each single.

Is acca insurance worth it?

It offsets a few percent of the margin; take it when you would bet the accumulator anyway.

Can I combine legs from different bookmakers?

Not in one bet; place singles at each and the average result is the same with less variance.

Was this guide useful?